Morris Minor vs Triumph Herald

Here's the place to chat about all things classic. Also includes a feedback forum where you can communicate directly with the editorial team - don't hold back, they'd love to know what they're doing right (or wrong of course!)
Message
Author
Phil P
Posts: 682
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2013 4:00 pm

Re: Morris Minor vs Triumph Herald

#51 Post by Phil P »

I've never owned either but worked on both in the 60's in a busy garage. Always liked the Herald and Vitesse's. The Moggy was easy to work on and drove well. The Herald handled well but not as predictable as the Moggy. I'd buy a herald and bin the body and go for a kit car conversion. I've seen a Vitesse with a 2.5 PI engine. Went very well but the diff etc was always getting 'distressed.'

Phil
Seth
Posts: 43
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:15 pm

Re: Morris Minor vs Triumph Herald

#52 Post by Seth »

Martin Evans wrote:I know that later Vitesse cars benefited from the revised rear suspension but bearing in mind that the chassis was originally designed to take the 948 engine, would a 2.5 six have been too much for it :?:
The original Herald chassis had substantial modifications done at the time when the Vitesse was developed so there are distinct Mk1 and Mk2 chassis. Changeover for Heralds was at some point in '62 so very early 1200 Heralds were on a Mk1 chassis though most were Mk2s.
User avatar
Martin Evans
Posts: 3274
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 10:16 am
Location: South Wales.
Contact:

Re: Morris Minor vs Triumph Herald

#53 Post by Martin Evans »

This looks like a good example of a Herald - http://www.classiccarsforsale.co.uk/cla ... ge/193183/
Rules exist for the obedience of fools and the guidance of wise men.

MG Midget 1500, MGB GT V8, Morris Minor Traveller 1275, MG Midget 1275 & too many bicycles.
Post Reply