rich. wrote:not forgetting the awful build quality
In reality, although some panel gaps were pretty random and the assembly workers were in the habit of leaving apple gowks behind the dashboards of Maxis (twice from the nine Dad & I have owned between us

), the build quality was a lot more pleasant in materials terms than that of today's cars where we find cheap ABS used in place of vinyl, carpet and card in trim panels, very little wood, none of it real in sub-£30k motors as far as I can tell, wiring that's invariably on its limit rather than being far heavier than was really needed and premature engine failures in at least three major brands caused by shipping cars across with the bare minimum of essential fluids present to save boat fare. OK, so if the delivery drivers took oil with them when going from local garages to Port o' Blyth to collect their stock then poured some in before thrashing the 'nads off the cars on their (often thirty mile +) trips to the showrooms, many such failures would simply not happen but if I had to get there & back asap for piece rates - which can fall quite legally below minimum wage if they don't break a few speed limits - then I'm not even sure whether I'd check and top up either, mechanical sympathy costs!
I believe that PDIs were key to a 1970s car's long term prospects, a good one would uncover and address many of the factory's inbuilt potential disasters but at least they shipped with sumps, transmissions and other places carrying sufficient of the relevant fluids and (for example) the Maxis, Dolomites and their contemporaries were nicely enough put together if you got a good one and another thing; modern motors creak and rattle annoyingly and randomly but in the '70s if anything was wrong it tended to make a much bigger noise and wouldn't take a dealership three bloody days to put right.
Progress? I see no evidence of that.
