Re: A couple of tractors - a slow restoration thread!
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 5:44 pm
Now you mention it, I remember the saga about the Perky engine! I suspect it still uses the old fashioned "TOU", but it would be best to check before trying it. From my memory, all Perkins engines leak oil (as, allegedly, do DBs). I seem to think you had to send the machine back if it didn't - so they could make it do so!
When I worked for the DB agency, the fitters didn't like the 885 - preferred the 780 (which preceded it). They reckoned the big cab (like the one on my 995) was far too heavy for it. I was called out by them one morning to see an 885 that they were loading on a wagon. The loading dock was about six inches higher than the wagon and, as they had a buckrake to deliver after the tractor, they put the buckrake on the tractor and reversed it on. When I saw it, the tractor was imitating a space rocket - nose almost straight in the air, with the buckrake stopping it going over backwards! It took four of us to weigh the front down enough to get the thing on the wagon - which, i soon realised, is why they called me out to see it!
They also loved the 880 - as do many on the David Brown Tractor Club forum. Personally, I thought the 780 was a handier tractor (with the same engine as the 880) - but the 880 was a better tractor for ploughing etc and punched well above its weight. Mind you, I don't remember any problems with the gear boxes: David Brown was (and still is) a respected gear company and, although old fashioned and noisy, the older boxes were tough - moreso than the syncro box on the 995s. Water was the enemy - got in through poor, or missing, gear lever gaiters.
When I worked for the DB agency, the fitters didn't like the 885 - preferred the 780 (which preceded it). They reckoned the big cab (like the one on my 995) was far too heavy for it. I was called out by them one morning to see an 885 that they were loading on a wagon. The loading dock was about six inches higher than the wagon and, as they had a buckrake to deliver after the tractor, they put the buckrake on the tractor and reversed it on. When I saw it, the tractor was imitating a space rocket - nose almost straight in the air, with the buckrake stopping it going over backwards! It took four of us to weigh the front down enough to get the thing on the wagon - which, i soon realised, is why they called me out to see it!
They also loved the 880 - as do many on the David Brown Tractor Club forum. Personally, I thought the 780 was a handier tractor (with the same engine as the 880) - but the 880 was a better tractor for ploughing etc and punched well above its weight. Mind you, I don't remember any problems with the gear boxes: David Brown was (and still is) a respected gear company and, although old fashioned and noisy, the older boxes were tough - moreso than the syncro box on the 995s. Water was the enemy - got in through poor, or missing, gear lever gaiters.










