I'd begrudge the Royals their wealth less if they spent it all on cool cars, Bacardi Breezer, blow and bongo downloads.

Yes, it's those damned Imperialists! They may fly helicopters on search-and-rescue missions, and have a basic knowledge of how to service and repair them, but as for a fuel filler cap on an Aston? Never. Freedom for Tooting, eh?johnnyanglia wrote:prince William has done absolutely nothing for the classic movement by driving down the mall in an Aston Martin. All his drive proved yet again was that we (and by in large through no choice of our own) are giving him and his family far too much money, which they neither deserve or have earned. The car is merely another trinket they own earned off the sweat of ourbrows. I doubt he even knows were the fuel goes let alone carry out a minor service.TriumphDriver wrote:I reckon Prince William has done more for the classic movement in one small drive down the mall in an Aston Martin than any amount of Drive It Days or other hype. I must invite him to our next show...
What a beautiful car, and what a lovely way to display it.
Yes, I agree, lovely car and nice to see a classic being used.TriumphDriver wrote:I reckon Prince William has done more for the classic movement in one small drive down the mall in an Aston Martin than any amount of Drive It Days or other hype. I must invite him to our next show...
What a beautiful car, and what a lovely way to display it.
Sorry m8, wasn't meant to be a snipe, just a remark that a high-profile television slot like this - watched by millions of people all round the world - will raise the profile of classic cars far higher than any Classic event to which a limited number of people go, or a certain day of the year when we're supposed to get out there and drive. judging by the number of times I've been asked what kind of car it was, it's certainly raised an interest in older cars, and if we can't exploit that to our own benefit then we're not trying. I'm certainly not going to tell a friendly enquirer that unless he's an elitist snob, he can't have one.Morrisand944S2man wrote: However, I disagree on your take a snipe at drive it day statement.
What a daft statement.Morrisand944S2man wrote: The benefit of the "drive it days" are that the general public can see that classic cars can be and indeed are owned and driven by ordinary everyday people. Classic Cars for all and not just the elite.
Maybe Morrisand944s2man just meant that if people see a lot of classics around then they realise that it isn't that rare for people to own and drive them.DoloMIGHTY wrote:What a daft statement.Morrisand944S2man wrote: The benefit of the "drive it days" are that the general public can see that classic cars can be and indeed are owned and driven by ordinary everyday people. Classic Cars for all and not just the elite.
How can a member of the general public know if someone is "posh" or not by simply seeing them drive past in an old car?
Maybe you can tell but I certainly can't tell as to what income someone might have who is driving past in a Morris 1000?
Wasn't that Morrisand944s2man's point?Adam43 wrote:Maybe DoloMIGHTY just meant that if people see a lot of classics around then they realise that it isn't that rare for people to own and drive them.DoloMIGHTY wrote:What a daft statement.Morrisand944S2man wrote: The benefit of the "drive it days" are that the general public can see that classic cars can be and indeed are owned and driven by ordinary everyday people. Classic Cars for all and not just the elite.
How can a member of the general public know if someone is "posh" or not by simply seeing them drive past in an old car?
Maybe you can tell but I certainly can't tell as to what income someone might have who is driving past in a Morris 1000?